Nine-nine! Snotlout Snotlout Oi Oi Oi! Cool. Coolcoolcoolcoolcoolcoolcoolcoolcool. For the love of Thor!
Whenever I watch something, I always recall what some characters say with emotion. I guess it’s my way of retaining information about that show/series/movie. When it comes to Brooklyn Nine-Nine, whenever I hear the cast say their famous catchphrases, it kind of gives me the satisfaction that somehow translates to “hey, I know that! It’s from Nine-Nine!” Since I finished watching Brooklyn Nine-Nine right before starting Dreamworks Dragons: Riders & Defenders of Berk, most of the memorable events in the series were still fresh in my memory. But now, after finishing (bingewatching) the two seasons in like a month, I felt like I kind of messed up and I’m thinking about how am I going to compare these two shows? I’ll give it a try.
Well, if I’m gonna compare a reality sitcom to a cartoon, maybe I’ll look out for the qualities that make a cartoon realistic. I’d have to say, the visuals of Riders & Defenders of Berk doesn’t really capture the fullness of human emotion of its characters. Although, the budget you have when making an animated series after a movie can be seen as an excuse.
Next, both shows appeal to different audiences. Brooklyn Nine-Nine definitely appeals to a more mature audience while Dreamworks Dragons goes for the younger ones, but it doesn’t mean that the mature ones couldn’t enjoy watching it. We might just have a little difficulty adjusting our viewing experience and expectations, but we can manage it. Nine-Nine uses some strong words that may not be appropriate for young viewers, but as long as they are being guided by adults while watching, I guess that’s okay(?).
One thing that I noticed is that in every episode they (the characters) start a problem, either a petty or a pretty serious one, then one character shines the most out of that problem. In both shows, the main character does not have to be the one outshining the rest. By the end of the show, they somehow manage to resolve the said problem. I sometimes don’t get why producers or directors compress one problem in 20 to 22 minutes, when it can be explained further in like two or three episodes. I guess it’s just a consumer habit that TV networks tend to abuse. I don’t know.
Also, what I noticed is that when it comes to scenes that require exaggeration, Brooklyn Nine-Nine tries its best to reach that somewhat “luck or skill” theme, while Riders & Defenders of Berk can freely do anything they want, because cartoons allow them to do so. By having characters that really don’t feel anything or doesn’t feel that much when experiencing life-threatening situations, they are somehow expendable. Real actors couldn’t afford doing such, even though they have acting doubles.
Fine, I’ll go with what I really think about the two shows. I’m not gonna try and be technical in this one.
I only liked Dreamworks Dragons: Riders & Defenders of Berk because they have dragons. That’s it. Even though their graphics aren’t really my type as I prefer more of the Japanese animations, because they tried creating a show that has dragons as one of the important characters in it, is amazing. Maybe some of the scenes wherein they got me teary-eyed because they triggered my family issues could be considered. But as a typical television show consumer, I wouldn’t really suggest my younger cousins to binge watch this. I’m going to recommend Riders & Defenders of Berk to them of course, because maybe they like dragons too, but to binge watch the show? I don’t think so.
Now, don’t get me wrong – I love Brooklyn Nine-Nine so much, but there are a few things I noticed about the show that makes me feel things. Negative things. First, it’s that sometimes, in an episode, a lot of things happen at the same time. It’s like I don’t know where to focus because Jake either does his hero ball way, or Rosa acts like the mean girl that she is, or Captain Holt dismisses everything then suddenly reverses his decision or something like that. Sometimes it’s hard not to watch the show and focus on one single character because of the numerous events that take place in a single episode.
Also, I don’t know if it’s just me, but I’m not quite sure whether they really give the New York Police District a different take. I think some, if not most of the characters somewhat give off a different energy than that of a typical detective in Brooklyn. I don’t know, maybe I just haven’t been to Brooklyn that’s why I’m saying this.
Lastly, I think that having several characters in a show helps in the plot of the story. I know, I might sound like I’m contradicting myself. In both of the shows, of course there is the main actor, but the supporting actors/actresses don’t really look like supporting actors/actresses. The shows give them enough limelight so that they can build a story of their own as the show progresses. I think that’s the best thing I can say about the two. I like how sometimes Ruffnut or Tuffnut can save the day with their stupid or borderline crazy antics, while Charles’s dad moves and Terry’s macho maneuvers actually solve a crime. It’s a good thing when you give the viewers a different taste per episode.
I guess watching a TV sitcom and using it to compare an animated series isn’t the best thing to do, especially since they’re two completely different entities. You can’t just boil it down to how unrealistic one is while the other is true to life. If you love both, then good for you. If you’re just a casual consumer just like me, who doesn’t really analyze what I’m watching, good for you as well. I mean, these shows sure give us a lesson or two about life, but it’s all about entertainment. And by watching them, we somehow relate to a more personal level than what we really think. And I guess that’s one thing we cannot compare.
