I found it quite challenging to find a good show to compare with DreamWorks’ Dragons. One, I don’t watch animated cartoons anymore; and two, I don’t even watch television shows anymore. I find it more entertaining to read and have my imagination take ownership of the novel I’m reading than simply absorb what the screen already has in stored for me. However; I found what I believe is to be the perfect to show to compare it. I recently tried and finished a television show entitled, The End of the F***ing World, which surprisingly has a handful of similarities and differences with Dragons.
The End of the F***ing World is a Netflix show released on October 2017. Unlike any ordinary romantic comedy show, it involves a psychopath boy who falls in love with his target for murder. From the description of the plot itself, it doesn’t seem comparable with an animation show like DreamWorks’ Dragons. With this, let’s start with the differences between both television shows and find the similarities given these differences.
In terms of the narrative structure of the shows, one (Dragons) is episodic while the other (The End of the F***ing World) is continuous.
Given that Dragons is episodic, each of its episode has its own plot. Although, some episodes contribute to the overall plot of the show that somehow ties all of the episodes together as mentioned in my previous blogs. Therefore, it’s quite easy to catch up on the show even without starting from the first episode since there’s also lack of character development. Lessons learned by the characters do not seem to be applied on the next episode. What simple kept the show continuous in a way were their random preparations and fights against Berks’ enemies, Berserkers and the Outcasts. Despite the lack of development however, the characters were able to have their own spotlight for an episode or two to emphasize their relevance in the show. However, it somehow makes sense on why it’s structured that way. It’s because its main target audience are children. Children have really low attention span and they need as much breaks as possible. That’s why even if each episode has its own plot and is only around 22 minutes long, it still has space for a commercial break in the middle given the short blackouts.
Unlike Dragons, The End of the F***ing World is continuous. Despite it being segmented into eight episodes, each episode is an hour long and is directly connected to the next episode. Character development is also very evident since we see the change happening to both main characters, James and Alyssa. Alyssa grew to be stronger and wiser as she thought of ways for her and James to survive independently from their families while James gradually let go of his need and want to kill then ended up wanting to save Alyssa’s life in the end. This is what makes people want to watch the show from the first episode in order to see that character development and plot development, which each event of each episode contributes in. Each of the episode doesn’t even have a commercial break in the middle of the episode. Even how the whole show was segmented into eight episodes, still makes people want to binge-watch the whole show since it usually ends with a cliffhanger. Such cliffhanger made me insane every single time! Especially at the end of the whole season, wherein it gave me an idea of a next season coming up.
Despite their differences, these are still similarities between the two shows. The breaks, may it be in the middle of each episode or between episodes, give the shows’ audiences their “breathing” and “thinking” space. What makes these alike and different from a full two-hour movie being shown in theaters is that we have a break to stretch, go to the bathroom, grab some food, and think to fully appreciate the story without having to miss anything and at the same time, be comfortable. Another similarity from the differences mentioned is the character development, may it be lacking or not. Both shows were able to emphasize each of its main characters by giving them sufficient time to illustrate his or her strengths and weaknesses, which makes the characters likable and relevant to the show. They basically contribute to the show and make it as is. The shows are the shows the creators wanted to present us with given its characters, who greatly contribute to their respective plots.
Another difference between the shows would be my television experience with each. I actually watched seasons one and two of Dragons since they’re required in my monthlong class on television. Honestly, I think I enjoyed it even if I’m not a binge-watcher given that we watch four episodes in two hours. I feel like I get a bigger picture of the show, which gives me more insights to think about and consider especially in class discussion. However, I still find myself enjoying watching a show one episode at a time to fully appreciate all the hard work the creators put in that one episode. I find myself having time to not only absorb the episode’s events but also appreciate the cinematography of the show and acting of the cast just like my watching experience with The End of the F***ing World. This does not mean that I didn’t enjoy our class though. I actually found our class discussions after viewing very helpful in terms of reflecting on the episodes together and hearing other people’s thoughts on the progress of the show’s structures. I guess what I’m trying to say is, despite the differences in time allotment for reflection and absorption, both experiences still gave me a fruitful thinking process. Dragons may have given me a shorter time to think but it provided me with new perspectives coming from other people.
Both shows are also similar in a way that they introduce new characters to set up an event that would contribute to their shows’ overall plot. In Dragons, new dragons are introduced, which makes it fun given the stories they bring with it. In The End of the F***ing World, new characters are also introduced but quickly however to strengthen Alyssa and James’ relationship and character. However way these characters were introduced, they successfully made the show interesting and adventurous that us, audience, would feel thrill and a variety of emotions.
Given these two shows, I realized that television offers a variety of shows that differ in narration and structures, but all of these are dependent on their target audience. I honestly don’t think that I have the right to identify their strengths and weaknesses given that their continuous existence means that there are people who enjoy them even if I don’t, but I think that both of the shows I’ve mentioned were structured strong enough to have succeeding seasons to come.
People have their own preferences. Some enjoy binge-watching, while others don’t. Some can start a show on its tenth episode or so, while others don’t. Some adults enjoy animated shows, while others don’t. Some like the shows, while others don’t. One thing is for sure, there are or will be succeeding seasons for DreamWorks’ Dragons and The End of the F***ing World.