Being honest, when the semester started, I was quite excited when it was mentioned that we would be comparing Defenders of Berk with our favorite show. Then I remembered that I didn’t really have one; I decided to go with Brooklyn Nine-Nine because I was two seasons in and said why the heck not-I’m actually happy that I went with it.
During the time I would watch the two shows, I noticed many differences and many similarities as well. A major difference I noticed on the offset was how I watched these shows. I watched Defenders of Berk as a requirement, and I would binge watch Brooklyn Nine-Nine in my free time, but it doesn’t mean that I didn’t necessarily enjoy both tv shows. It is also very obvious that the shows carry to difference audiences-one being for the younger age group, another being for adolescents and the older age groups. Another obvious difference would be how Brooklyn Nine-Nine is a sitcom that uses real people, while Defenders of Berk is a cartoon, animated.
An obvious similarity on the other hand would be their episode lengths. Brooklyn Nine-Nine usually has their episodes at 22 – 23 minutes, while Defenders of Berk has it around there as well (or 20 minutes). I guess this is done to be able to cater to a wider set of audience given the consumption patterns that are prevalent. The shorter episodes kept me more entertained and it was easier to digest and take in because they weren’t so lengthy and intense. I will admit that at some points (some episodes) I got tense watching both shows, anticipating how problems would be resolved, but it would usually be resolved immediately within the 20 minute episode (or sometimes would carry over to the next slightly).
I also noticed that both shows are very episodic. Yes, watching them continuous would help you and give the characters more depth, but even if you watch them out of order, you would still understand what was happening because of how the episodes are patterned. Both shows introduce a problem (or several problems) at the beginning of the episode, then they are able to resolve it at the end of the episode.
Another similarity I did notice was the dynamic of the main cast. Both shows center around the main cast (although it does extend sometimes to a bigger New York, or in Defenders of Berk‘s case, the island of Berk) but they keep the conflict central to the main cast. Even if a problem arises outside of the main cast, it is always someone within the cast who finds a way to solve it.
Talking about the main cast, I would like to compare some characters from the casts of both shows.
I would first like to compare Captain Holt and Sergeant Jeffords of Brooklyn Nine-Nine and Stoick of Defenders of Berk. Now I know that Stoick is not necessarily in the ‘main cast’ or the barkada of Hiccup, but I think this is a good comparison to make. Captain Holt is the captain (duh) in charge of the 99th precinct, and he has assigned Sergeant Jeffords as kind of the next-in-line captain, and both in charge of a team of detectives. Parallel to this, Stoick is basically the captain (or the head) of the vikings on the island of Berk. These characters lead a number of people towards resolving issues, and are there to make life better and easier for others. The characters are strong male leader figures and all three have great influence over the people they work with. They all do not succumb to the iron-fist way of implementing their power, however when needed, they are strict and straightforward. Both of them like things done a certain way and often criticize ways that are done differently, but if it gets the job done, in the end they are accepting of it.
The next characters I would like to compare are Jake Peralta and Hiccup. They are both somewhat the stars of the show (although maybe in Jake’s case it is debatable because as stated earlier, both shows focus on the dynamic of the main cast so all are important). Both of the characters take on the role of learning from their mentors (Captain Holt and Stoick). Coincidentally as well, Stoick is Hiccup’s father, and as mentioned in the show several times, Jake sees Captain Holt as his father figure.
Throughout the show, we also see a development in the relationships of Jake-Captain Holt and Hiccup-Stoick. Both these characters help navigate where the show is going next.
The next pair of characters I would like to compare are Amy Santiago and Astrid. Both these female characters are the romantic interests of our male leads (Jake Peralta and Hiccup). They are both more serious than their male counterparts, and actually complement them as well. They are both strong female leads. Both characters don’t give in to the damsel in distress type of lead who needs some type of ‘saving’. They are both strong-willed and also push the shows forward.
The next characters to be compared are Hitchcock and Scully and Ruffnut and Tuffnut. These two pairs of characters both do the same thing for their respective shows and are mainly present for comic relief. Both pairs do become important and more ‘used’ in some episodes, but for the majority of their time on the show, they are simply for more laughs.
Although I do know that both casts have more important characters as well, I just wanted to run down through the similarities of some of the characters.
I did realize that Brooklyn Nine-Nine tackles more contemporary issues through their episodes, and tackles them as we would in real-life (such as racism, discrimination and the like), while Defenders of Berk tackles problems within the make-believe world. This goes to show that the shows are situated within two very different realms and cater to two very different audiences as well.
What I do like about both shows is that you kind of know that Jake and Hiccup are the main characters and the other can be said to just be supporting ones, but as I said earlier, the shows really center in on the dynamic of the whole group; this brings the supporting characters forward and make them still very important to the storylines.
To be completely honest, I enjoy both shows because they are very light and easy to take in. I watch shows in my free time and I do it for leisure, so I don’t really want to be thinking too much when I watch my shows. I would recommend both shows to my friends (some younger/some older) because they are easy to watch.
Both shows don’t necessarily give me personal insights (even if Defenders of Berk did have some moral lessons–and Brooklyn Nine-Nine had some not-explicitly-stated-lessons as well). But I never really took them to heart because I guess upon watching both shows, I was just looking for a way to pass my time (and pass the class in the case of Defenders of Berk). Both shows weren’t necessarily relatable as well, but as I repeated, they are both very easy to watch. I did enjoy watching both shows and I enjoyed being able to compare the characters.