In order to really analyze the two shows side-by-side, and compare their elements and structure it would be important to know where the biggest differences of the two lie. To do that, I must first establish what the two shows are.
I don’t have to really talk about what Dreamworks’ Dragons is all about mainly because we have all been collectively watching it for the past month and any attempt at explaining the plot would be all too redundant. Instead I will explain the show Samurai Champloo which in my opinion is the best anime to ever be produced. Ever.
Samurai Champloo (SC) is a japanese anime that is about three people consisting of a girl and two swordsmen travelling together for the sole purpose of finding a “samurai who smells of sunflower”. For the purpose of preventing spoilers I will not talk about the plot much instead I will talk about its elements and usual structure. SC is episodic in nature wherein each episode has a conflict that must be resolved, but despite that the trio still push onward with their travels. You could say that in every stop-over they have, that is where the conflict arises. Needless to say, the narrative structure of the show is dependent on their location at any given moment of their travels. If they manage to stay in one place for an extended period of time, then the conflict of the episode/s stays the same. Once they begin moving again, the conflict shifts to something new with new personalities and characters being introduced along the way. Again, the main end goal is to find Mr.Sunflower Samurai. It’s a simple structure that the show manages to explore and use successfully. As long as they haven’t found him, more adventures lie. There really is no overarching bad guy ala Dagur or Alvin and only three characters maybe four stick around until the end. So from these characteristics alone we can see the difference in both shows and maybe these differences can explain why things are the way they are in both shows.
Getting into the characters of both shows, I have said in previous blog posts that the size of the main cast is one of the biggest differences. The dragon riders alone comprise of 6 main characters that need both development and proper attention which the show more or less successfully did in season 2 (in comparison to season 1). SC only has three main characters that appear on every episode which makes the sharing of the screen time easier. Jin, Mugen and Fuu (the aforementioned three) show amazing chemistry and contrast in the show which is always expressed in each episode and I mean EACH. The dragon riders meanwhile have somewhat sparing depictions of chemistry bar Hiccup and Astrid though it’s not all that bad since we do get some episodes where each of them get enough time to flesh out their relationships. I assume that having more characters with their own backstories and motives and individual goals makes this task exponentially tougher to fully realize and is definitely a big difference when it comes to the two shows.
With all that being said, there are two elements where both shows have a similarity. One is theme and the other is the use of humor. Both shows have themes about maturity, morality and conflict. Family is another theme that is expressed well in both shows. History is another theme that is apparent since Dragons has that viking mythology vibe while SC is about feudal, historical Japan. Despite these similarities the execution on the other hand is wholly different. I cannot stress enough that Samurai Champloo is not totally a children’s show. I mean of course children are still welcome to watch it, but in comparison to Dreamworks’ Dragons it’s not even close. Violence, gore and profanity (in the english dub, which is definitely the way to go in terms of viewing the show) are common in SC and the show is very unapologetic about it, something that is quite common in anime. This means that the depiction of violence is quite gruesome and expressing the themes of conflict and human sexuality is vivid and a little bit realistic. Heads and other appendages are chopped and breasts are fondled. Dragons meanwhile stays true to its young audience and is provides the most wholesome entertainment without sacrificing any thematic value. In Dragons, its more of like “Hey Hiccup don’t be mean to Snotlout because he is just a proud viking and you guys are best friends” while in SC, it’s more of like “you fuckin asshole, you tried to steal my money. Give it back or I’ll chop you and all your little friends up to pieces”. No lie that’s probably a real line from the show.
One thing I love about both shows is their use of humor. They both have a similar approach to it in the sense that a lot of the comedic relief comes from the “stupid” characters like the twins and Snotlout for Dragons and Mugen for SC. They always crack funny one/two liners here and there in most episodes which really stand out and never fail to make me chuckle at the very least. I guess much of the credit goes to the brilliant writers and to the fact that humor is the same across different cultures (more or less). Stupid people and their stupid ideas seem to be funny in both eastern and western cultures. At Least there’s one thing the two can agree about.
Last thing to compare between the two shows is the visual style and aesthetic. Again much of this goes back to the identity of the show. One is a wholesome children’s cartoon program and the other is an artsy, violent anime. Animation is quite different between the two given their natures since one is 3D animated and the other is just 2D, drawing-type animation which is the standard for pretty much all anime. It’s probably not even considered an anime anymore if it starts venturing in to the 3D world. That being said Dragons is bright and simple. There not a whole lot going on visually speaking and when a lot IS going on, it’s usually due to the chaotic dragon fight scenes. The show is easy to watch and kids would definitely have no qualms about how the show looks. The frightmare episode really stands out when it comes to visuals and it was definitely a treat to watch. Samurai Champloo on the other hand is consistent in delivering this sort of vibrant and very artsy somewhat “ukiyo-esque” type of visual. As someone who really appreciates visual forms of art, I really do love how the show looks and is always a blast to watch. The fight scenes are animated in such a way that they’re overtly trying to make everything look badass.
I like both shows. I was quite indifferent to Season 1 of Dragons because of this lacking touch of overall quality, but when season 2 came around the show already grew on me. I had begun to appreciate the show in terms of what it offered to an older viewer like me. Quality, wholesome entertainment that is actually quite funny. SC meanwhile is just totally the best anime ever and I couldn’t say enough to justify how good it really is. I do appreciate the fact that watching the former in class opened my eyes to how objectively decent children’s shows are. I kind-of thought they were just shallow programs that kids can mindlessly consume for entertainment. Analysing Dragons episode by episode opened my eyes to the depth and nuance that these kinds of shows can exhibit with some economical and realistic underpinnings or implications. Good stuff.