Avatar: The Last Airbender is a television program which aired on 2005 in Nickelodeon. It focuses on Avatar Aang’s quest in mastering all four elements in order to defeat the main antagonist, the Fire Lord. The reason why I chose this show was that it too is an animated tv series and falls under the fantasy genre. This blog post will compare the world building, animation styles, and narrative structure of Avatar and Dreamworks Dragons.
In terms of world-building, both programs borrowed the cultures of real life people. For Dreamworks Dragons, the vikings are the main characters of the show. Similar to real-life Vikings, they are known for their skills in combat and navigation. They also live in islands which have freezing temperatures, thus the characters mostly wear fur clothing and boots. As for the Avatar universe, the world is divided into 4 nations, water, earth, fire, and air. Similar to Dreamworks Dragons, the world of Avatar is inspired by real-life influences, specifically Asian and Inuit cultures. For example, the water tribes resemble the Inuit or Ekimos, with they way that they live in igloos and wear animal skins to protect against the cold. As for the Earth Kingdom, it is based on China. The walls of Ba Sing Sei, the capital of the Earth Kingdom, was inspired by the Beijing wall of China as a line of defense, and so on.
From architecture and clothing, to food and grooming, the screenwriters borrowed the cultures of communities today and put it in a fantastical, mythologized lens. I believe the reason why both Dreamworks Dragons and Avatar used real-life influences is so that viewers would be able to easily understand and connect to the world even though the tv shows fall under the fantasy genre. These cultures are popular and therefore familiar even to young children, which make the worlds more convincing, and engaging to its audience.
Another similarity between the shows is that the world building approach is done in a manner wherein the main protagonist and the audience learn and understand the world at the same time. For example, in Dreamworks Dragons, it is through the experiences of Hiccup and his friends that they are able to constantly update the Book of Dragons. In other words, while they find new things about the dragons, the audience does as well. In the case of Avatar, this approach is done by letting Aang not know the current condition of the world because he was frozen in a block of ice for a hundred years. Due to his state, he explores all four nations and understands the inner workings of the world the same time the audience does. This approach allows the screenwriters to present a new world without it feeling forced nor overwhelming upon viewers. In this way, viewers learn about it in the same pace and point of view as the main character. I believe this strategy was a good move executed by the both screenwriters of the shows since the age of the main characters are more or less the same as that of the target audience. This then makes it easier for the viewers to learn about the world because it is presented in a language or speech they can understand.
One difference between the Avatar universe from all the other worlds crafted is that the people are able to bend elements. Unlike in Dreamworks Dragons wherein the magical element is rooted in the concept of dragons, the ability for people to manipulate elements is what makes the world of Avatar magical and original. The world building is developed not in the introduction of dragons, but the new techniques on how to manipulate the elements. For instance, it was only in the latter seasons when the concepts of blood bending and metal bending were used, which are natural extensions of water bending and earth bending respectively. Overall, it is demonstrated that the way magic and fantasy are used dictate the world building of the shows.
Moving on to animation styles, it is evident by simply watching the first few scenes of the show that Dreamworks Dragons is a 3D animation series while Avatar is a 2D animation series. The first season of Dreamworks Dragons was aired in 2012, seven years after the release of Avatar’s pilot episode. This is why it is fitting that it used newer and more improved technology. The show also involves lots of movements and depth due to the flying done by the dragons. On the other hand, Avatar is heavily influenced by anime which I believe is the reason for its 2D animation style. For example, the exaggerated facial expressions and emotion of characters reflect the visual attributes of anime. More importantly, Avatar is mostly hand drawn due to the integration of martial arts in bending. For every action sequence, it is important to place attention on each position and pose to create movement. Every key frame needs to be precise and sketches are made to to make the animation move more fluidly. Overall, both shows used different animation styles because of different purposes.
In terms of narrative structure, both television programs have twenty or more episodes in a season, and each episode lasts a little over 20 minutes. However, while the episodes in Dreamworks Dragons are mostly episodic, Avatar is a mixture of both episodic and continuous. In the former, it is noticeable the the characters do not learn from their mistakes. They commit the same offenses and their behavior does not change. Moreover, the problems the villagers encounter are solved by the end of the episode, which is seen especially in the first season. It is usually only when the villains appear that the plot becomes continuous. Similar to the show, Avatar also had an episodic structure in some episodes. However, most episodes were continuous because there was a clear and distinct plot: defeat the Fire Lord. All the subplots in Avatar contribute to the main plot of the entire show. Each season corresponds to a nation that Aang visits in order to find and train with a teacher. For example, the first season is entitled “Water” which entails his adventures in the Water Tribes and training with a water bending master. Once a new season begins, Aang still remembers all that he has learned from his previous master. Unlike Avatar, Dreamworks Dragons has a more general plot which focuses on the lines of training dragons and stopping enemies. Consequently, so many problems are tackled in just one season. Because it has a less specific overall plot, the show is then more open to what happens next. It’s astonishing to see what people can do differently given the same time length.
Furthermore, while Dreamworks Dragons has a more linear structure, Avatar follows a non-linear narrative. More specifically, Avatar invests some episodes on flashbacks to fully explore the main characters’ past. In a single episode, viewers learn which events of a characters’ past affect them and their decision making in the present. With a backstory, viewers are able to emotionally connect with the characters as well as find out their motivations. Once we understand their past mistakes, the characters become more relatable since we see ourselves in their flaws. Development of character comes into place when characters realize and confront their mistakes. One they succeed in doing this, they are able to grow and change, which will ultimately captivate the audience to the characters and their story. A backstory or character development may not be so obviously seen in Dreamwork Dragons, but this is mainly due to the targeted audience: young children. Young children do not require to seeing character development which is why most of the characters in animated television shows are static. However, Avatar is also intended for those outside the 6-11 year old demographic as seen in the themes discussed in the show such as war, genocide, and even mental illness. It may have some comic relief, but I believe it tackles more serious issues compared to that of Dreamworks Dragons. This, I believe, is the purpose of establishing a non-linear narrative by the creators of Avatar.
Overall, both shows may have differences, but it is because each has a different purpose or plot. Watching them side by side, I’ve also noticed that they have similarities especially in terms of world building. I don’t think I could decide which show is better since it really depends on the person. However, I think both shows are more than worth watching and I’m glad I had such a fun experience watching them.